Skip to content
UX Atlas
Research methodEstablished researchIntermediate

Card Sorting

Asking users to group content, which reveals their mental model of a domain rather than your org chart.

Definition

Participants group items into categories that make sense to them. Open sorts let them name the groups; closed sorts use predefined categories to test an existing structure.

Established research. Originates in published research and has been replicated. The effect is real. Its size in your product still needs measuring.

On this page
  1. Definition
  2. Which variant to run
  3. Running one
  4. In practice
  5. Continue from here

Which variant to run

VariantQuestion it answers
OpenHow do users naturally group this content, and what do they call the groups?
ClosedDoes our proposed structure match how users think?
HybridDoes our structure work, and what is missing from it?

Running one

  • Use 30 to 60 items. Fewer produces thin data; more exhausts participants.
  • Label items in the users' words, not internal terminology.
  • Fifteen to thirty participants gives reasonably stable clusters for a quantitative analysis.
  • Analyse with a similarity matrix or dendrogram rather than by eye.
  • Follow up with tree testing, because a sort tells you how people group and a tree test tells you whether they can find things.

In practice

Sorts reveal vocabulary

Information architecture

The names participants give their groups in an open sort are frequently more valuable than the groupings themselves, because they are the labels the navigation should use.

Each link says what the connection is, so you can tell a principle from an alternative from a thing people mix this up with.

Applies when you are designing

Principles behind this

The reasoning this solution is an application of.

Often used with

These usually appear in the same screen or the same decision.

Short definition

The one-paragraph version, for when that is all you need.

Related concept

Connected closely enough to change how you apply this.