Inclusive Language
Writing that does not exclude, misgender or make assumptions about the person reading it.
Definition
Inclusive language avoids wording that excludes people or embeds assumptions about identity, ability, family structure, nationality or technical knowledge.
Craft convention. True because the industry converged on it. Breaking it costs familiarity, not correctness.
On this plate
Reach for this when
- Writing any user-facing text.
- Designing forms that collect personal information.
- Reviewing an existing product.
- Designing any form that asks who somebody is.
Common mistakes
- Structured name fields.
- Required gender or title fields.
- Ability-based metaphors in instructions.
- Idioms that do not survive translation.
Practical rules
- Use they for a person of unknown gender rather than he or she, or write around the pronoun.
- Avoid ability metaphors where a plain word exists: 'check' rather than 'see', 'select' rather than 'click' where the input may not be a mouse.
- Do not assume family structure, marital status or nationality in form fields.
- Make name fields a single free text field where possible. Structured first and last name fields fail for a large proportion of the world.
- Make gender fields optional, with an open or non-binary option, and only ask when you genuinely need the data.
- Avoid idioms and cultural references that do not translate.
- Use person-first or identity-first language according to the stated preference of the community involved, which differs between communities.
Assumptions built into common fields
| Field | Assumption | Better |
|---|---|---|
| First name and surname | Everyone has exactly two names in that order | Full name, one field, generous length |
| Title | A fixed list covers everyone | Optional, free text, or omitted |
| Gender | Two options, and that you need it | Ask only if you use it, with a free-text option |
| Postcode format | One country's shape | Accept the formats of the markets you serve |
| Phone number | A fixed length and a local format | International format, tolerantly parsed |
In practice
- i.
The name that would not fit
Field constraints as exclusionA form rejecting a name with an apostrophe, and another truncating at fifteen characters, both told readers their name was invalid. The validation was written for a database column, and the reader is the one who felt it.
Local chart
WRT·005 · Region III · Grid E2
This entry and the entries it is stated to connect with. Each line is labelled with what the connection means.
Continue from here
Each link says what the connection is, so you can tell a principle from an alternative from a thing people mix this up with.
Check your work
Review passes that test whether this was done properly.
- Accessibility ChecklistCHK·002 · Checklist
- Form UX ChecklistCHK·001 · Checklist
Short definition
The one-paragraph version, for when that is all you need.
- Inclusive DesignTERM·082 · Term
Related concept
Connected closely enough to change how you apply this.
- UI to UX WritingAI·006 · AI workflow
- Text InputCMP·003 · Component
- Content DesignWRT·004 · UX writing
- InternationalizationWRT·006 · UX writing
- MicrocopyWRT·001 · UX writing
- Voice and ToneWRT·003 · UX writing